Are we seeing the world as it really is?

Adobe Stock

OPINION — Many of us spend time on online platforms watching news, current events, history, health information and other topics that interest us. They are remarkable sources of knowledge. But there is one question worth asking: Are these platforms showing us the world — or simply showing us what keeps us watching?

These platforms are designed to recommend content that holds our attention. Videos that stir fear, anger, outrage or surprise often generate more clicks, so the system tends to offer us more of the same.

Psychologists have identified several ways this can influence our thinking. Mean World Syndrome describes how repeated exposure to negative stories can make the world seem more dangerous or divided than it really is. Availability bias causes us to believe events are more common simply because we see them repeatedly. Confirmation bias encourages us to accept information that supports our existing beliefs, while echo chambers limit our exposure to different viewpoints.

None of this means the videos are false. Many are completely accurate. The challenge is that they often highlight exceptional events rather than ordinary life.

Before accepting any video as proof of “what’s happening everywhere,” ask a few simple questions: Is this an isolated incident? Would someone else receive different recommendations? Have I looked at more than one reliable source?

Most of us experience something very different each day — neighbors helping neighbors, people treating one another with respect and communities working together to solve problems.

Online platforms remain valuable tools for learning. The key is remembering that their algorithms are designed to maximize our attention, not necessarily to provide the most balanced picture of reality. Staying informed begins with staying curious, seeking different viewpoints and looking beyond a single screen.

Please submit comments at yourvalley.net/letters or email them to AzOpinions@iniusa.org. We are committed to publishing a wide variety of reader opinions, as long as they meet our Civility Guidelines.